HSC Legal Studies · The Crime Core (30%)

Chapter 4
Sentencing & Punishment

How the court decides a penalty — guidelines, purposes, factors, penalties and what comes after · NESA Syllabus 2009
Where we're going

By the end of this chapter you can…

4.1

Statutory & judicial guidelines

4.1.1 Statutory guidelines

Parliament sets the frame

The Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) is the primary source of sentencing law.

Maximum penalties

Set by Parliament for each offence (murder = life). Reserved for the "worst case".

Standard non-parole periods

Since 2003 — a reference point for an offence of "middle" seriousness. A guidepost, not a floor.

4.1.2 Judicial guidelines

The courts guide themselves

A guideline judgment from the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal sets an indicative approach for a class of case — for consistency & predictability.

R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346

Guideline judgment for armed robbery — a benchmark range judges can measure against.

Controversial: consistency vs the loss of judicial discretion.

4.1.3 Mandatory sentencing

When Parliament fixes the penalty

R v Jacobs (No 9) [2013] NSWSC 1470

Michael Jacobs murdered Senior Constable David Rixon (Tamworth, 2012). First test of s 19Bmandatory life for murdering a police officer.

Also: one-punch "assault causing death" — mandatory 8 yrs if intoxicated (ss 25A–25B).

4.1.3 The debate

Mandatory sentencing — for & against

For

Certainty & consistency · denounces serious crime · answers public demand

Against

Removes discretion · little evidence it deters · "knee-jerk" reaction · risks injustice

A ready-made balancing rights + discretion + law reform discussion.

4.2

The purposes of punishment

4.2 Purposes — s 3A

Four aims the court balances

Deterrence

Specific (this offender) & general (society). Evidence it works is weak.

Retribution

Deserved, proportionate punishment — not private revenge.

Rehabilitation

Reform the offender; reduce recidivism.

Incapacitation

Remove the ability to reoffend (prison, disqualification).

4.2 Purposes

The aims pull against each other

Deterrence & retribution push the sentence up; rehabilitation pushes it toward a supervised, lighter order.

A good answer shows the court balancing them — and judges whether the balance is just.

4.3

Factors in a sentence

4.3 Factors — s 21A

Aggravating vs mitigating

Aggravating → harsher

Violence/weapon · vulnerable victim · in company/planned · abuse of trust · hate motive

Mitigating → lighter

No record · remorse · early guilty plea (up to 25%) · youth · good rehab prospects

4.4

The victim in sentencing

4.4 The victim

Victim impact statements

A voluntary statement of the harm caused, which the court may consider — but the court still sets the penalty. Rights under the Victims Rights and Support Act 2013 (NSW).

Family VIS reform — 2014

The Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Amendment (Family Victim Impact Statements) Act 2014 let a family VIS be considered in homicide sentencing.

4.5

Appeals

4.5 Appeals

Who appeals what?

Against conviction

The offender says they shouldn't have been convicted → acquittal or retrial.

Sentence — severity

The offender says it was too harsh.

Sentence — Crown

The prosecution says it was too lenient.

4.5 Case study

A Crown severity appeal

R v Loveridge [2014] NSWCCA 120

The one-punch killing of Thomas Kelly (Kings Cross). On a Crown appeal the CCA found the sentence manifestly inadequate and increased it to 13 yrs 8 mths. Drove the one-punch laws.

4.6

Types of penalty

4.6 Penalties — the current law

Least → most severe

4.6 Update your notes

Gone since 24 Sept 2018

NSW abolished good behaviour bonds, suspended sentences & home detention — replaced by the CRO, CCO & ICO.

Don't list the old penalties in an exam. A law reform aimed at rehabilitation & cutting recidivism.

4.6 Imprisonment

Total sentence + non-parole period

Prison is a last resort. The court sets a total sentence and a non-parole period — the minimum served before the offender is eligible for parole (not automatic release).

4.7

Alternative sentencing

4.7 Alternatives

Circle sentencing & restorative justice

Circle sentencing

Adult Aboriginal offenders; magistrate sits with Elders & community (Criminal Procedure Regulation 2017, Pt 7).

Restorative justice

Offender meets victim; take responsibility & repair. Youth conferencing — Wagga Wagga, 1991.

Examples of discretion and rehabilitation over pure punishment.

4.8

After the sentence

4.8 Post-sentencing

Inside prison & release

Classification & custody

Security classification (max/medium/min); protective custody for at-risk prisoners (duty of care).

Parole

Conditional release after the non-parole period; conditions; State Parole Authority decides.

4.8 Detention on future risk

Controversial measures

Continued detention

Kept beyond sentence — serious violent/sexual offenders (Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006).

Preventative detention

Detain to prevent a terrorist act (Terrorism (Police Powers) Act 2002).

Punishing predicted risk vs the presumption of innocence — a live rights debate.

End of Chapter 4

Recap & check

Guidelines (statutory/judicial/mandatory) · purposes · factors · the victim · appeals · current penalties (CRO/CCO/ICO) · alternatives · post-sentencing. Next: Chapter 5 — Young Offenders.
1 / 0